Had this urge to say something. Perhaps its due to the stresses that are coming from the exams being 2 wks time. Perhaps its from what I learnt at cell today. Perhaps, its a tip from God about my Religion paper...
'Words are meant to be written, said, read, and listened to'. How's that? That's what we always take words to be. Mere icons. They represent something else. But do these icons hold any specific meaning, or translate into any positive action on our part? Do they change from being mere 'icons' to 'symbols' - actually representing an action or other entity?
We could say things that are not meant to hurt others. We use our words with such looseness in this modern time, that speech has been commodified. Commodification of the spoken word has reached the extent of words not being valued as much as they should have been. The gift of sentient beings is the ability to communicate intelligibly. Think about that.
Was just going thru a related thought...and I have come to realise that people continue to perceive me in some light that I just find intriguing. True, I may have been more chatty/outspoken/sociable/even..."full of nonsense" if you'd go to that extent of describing me in when I'd just entered Uni. It is funny isn't it, how we change?
You'd think that Personality sticks with you for life. In a social science argument, you'd say, "oh but it does change, according to political/social/geographical/economic...etc" factors. And I'd say yes. it DOES. I've made it clear to friends who try placing others into 'neat little categorized' holes formed by the Myer-Briggs Test (I call it the "Four-Letter Test"...because it has this odd-habit of classing you into one of 16 four-lettered categories) that I absolutely DETEST it. You can't label a person from young that he's 'ASOB', and expect him to remain an 'ASOB'...just because he pushed you and your bicycle over and stole your lollipop when you were five (although if you could catch those kids in my neighbourhood from ACJS who played dirty...I'd appreciate it. But moving on...)
Likewise, don't expect your EF-Whatever-whatever to stick along with a growing person. True, some people may be more inclined to be open in a social context and mingle. You could call them "E" (for extroverted) at some point. How about other situations when they just sit it out, and not move their lips, and not issue any noise at all. I could name a few...(totally bone debates, ridiculous statements...and really unsocial characters in the vicinity).
As I said before, this article is not aimed at any specific readers. Rather, if you may, absorb and try comprehending what I've tried to articulate. Classing people may seem fine-and-dandy for a 'meritocratic' society...after-all, we DO need people to govern, and others to be governed. But classing people right down to the almost impossible details (and I say this from an anthropological viewpoint) of gender, ethnicity, language, and even personality...is absurd. Stereotypes serve their purpose in governance and control (Foucault will gladly expound his panoptic essays)...but stereotypes to govern interactions with friends and even family are simply ridiculous.
Surely, now, we could be more open to accepting diversity?
Surely we can...or can't we?
i can’t get (a) even if i wanted to but to be honest, i think higher education is about learning, not just grades. i think its more important that you leave the place with knowledge that changes and inspires, than a First Class Honours in modules which were easy to score or something.
dunno lei. i like to do fun/ interesting modules, regardless of difficulty level. haha. so i guess i’m (b). and that might be partly due to the fact that my future career choices doesn’t rely heavily on my Hons. class.
Comment by fiza — Sun, 23 April 2006 @ 2:41 pm
I’d tend to agree with Fiza…that Uni education is not abt grades (or shouldn’t be made out to be that way). Besides…I’m not for the case where ppl ‘pia’ their lives out just so they get a First Class…but miss out on other great things in life (hanging with friends, seeing amazing sunrises - cos they’re prob still stuck in their little cubicles/study rooms mugging their brains to mush).
So I will go by (b).
Comment by Nian — Mon, 24 April 2006 @ 1:13 pm
Having said that…I’m still a USP student…who loves to learn about things ‘out of the box’.
Unfortunately…its kinda paradoxical…cos the entire USP community is driven by the tendency to do things within their ’skill-set’ …and thus not wanting to venture to try something different. Maybe its not just USP. Was thinking that it could be the entire Uni community. Not wanting to be penalised by some ‘crappy-Arts/Science’ module they did…when they’re a Straight A Mechanical Engine whiz.
The system has got to be improved. Otherwise, whatever we say about ‘multi-disciplinary’ and ‘learning out of the box’ is just empty talk.
Comment by Nian — Mon, 24 April 2006 @ 1:33 pm
all i can say is that, if someone is really intelligent, it won’t matter if you’re a engin student or some IT geek… you will still be able to get ‘A’s for intro/USP arts/science classes… :)
Comment by jules — Mon, 24 April 2006 @ 11:42 pm
Jules, Understand what you mean. And yes, we all wish to think we’re intelligent enough to get our share of complete distinctions, and as a British saying goes…still “be back home for tea and medals”. But oft it doesn’t work that way.
I’m sure you know as well as I, that school life is very much one or the other unless you are the said “really intelligent” person. And even then, all people - whether “really intelligent” or “plain Jane Average” people have only 24 hours to spare. So its a matter of time management yes?
Yes…and more.
Perhaps I’m just ’sore’ about not doing as well as many other ‘USPs’. Maybe my CAP is not as glittering. Maybe I’m using this opportunity to justify why I did so ‘badly’ in my first year. Well, I’d like to state that my case one of a kind. First Sem…USP mod…I did pretty much the entire project. And I still failed. Do you see where I’m getting at?
I’m not holding it against any of my friends who do better than me, be it from sheer hard work and diligence (kudos to them), or by getting easy tips on spotting ‘ace-able’ modules which give ‘easy grades’.
All I’m saying is that, my failure was my fault in being unable to keep up with such a system, which penalises students right from the start, when we’re not even attuned to what University education IS - in practice (as opposed to what is stated in theory) - that of being able to outdo one’s fellow student on the bell-curve and reign supreme with the glorious 5.0 CAP.
P.S. Sorry Laremy for using your blog as a ‘rant’ board if it seems like it, I’m just trying to clarify the point. Thanks.